The Mile-Hi Jeep Club Web Forum

RegisterSearchFAQUsergroupsLog in
Reply to topic Page 3 of 3
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3
Colorado Illegal Rd Closure Update
Author Message
Reply with quote
Post  
The Colorado Springs Independent is doing a story on this issue and Lamborn's incompetence on Friday. Apparently the writer has only been given limited space at this time, but it's a good start.


_________________
Dan
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
Reply with quote
Post  
If it's available to read online can you please send us the link.

Keep up the fight Dan, we are behind you.

View user's profile Send private message
Reply with quote
Post  
Please find the latest article on Congressman Lamborn’s ineffectiveness at the following link. This appeared in the Colo. Spgs. Independent on Thursday.

Media, please note that I am available for comment.

http://www.bodyintellect.com/forest_service/csi_lamborn_1-28-10.jpg


_________________
Dan
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
Reply with quote
Post  
Another good reason for term limits.

View user's profile Send private message
Reply with quote
Post Contact 
Hi all,

I will attempt to make contact with Mr. Tidwell directly, unless somebody has reason for me not to. Obviously Lamborn is useless.

Thanks,

David McDaniel
New MHJC Land Use Chairman


_________________
David McDaniel
View user's profile Send private message
Reply with quote
Post S. Rampart TMP 
Please note that the last public meeting for the South Rampart Travel Management Plan (TMP) took place earlier this month. You have until April 12 to submit your comments. The FS did a very good job of making information available for your review, such as comparison maps, comment forms, the presentation itself, etc. You may find everything you need here: http://southrampart.net/

What I find particularly interesting is that the proposed changes as seen in Alternative B and C (Alternative A is the current situation) do not match. Put another way, in Alternative B FSR 322A is supposed to be reopened yet in Alternative C it is supposed to be categorized as an Administrative trail. This is important because the TMP must be based on science, according to federal law (see 36 CFR 212 for more). So if the science indicates that a trail must be closed, it would seem that this should be so in both Alternatives. Unless, of course, the decision was NOT based on science, in which case it would appear to be arbitrary and capricious. This is the sort of thing the law does not like and would provide us with strong grounds for appeal. Please note that this situation applies to several roads, not just FSR 322A.


_________________
Dan
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
Display posts from previous:
Reply to topic Page 3 of 3
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum